Australia bans children under 16 on social media: companies react

Social media companies slam Australia's under-16 ban

Social media giants on Friday hit out at a landmark Australian law banning them from signing up under-16s, describing it as a rush job littered with "many unanswered questions".

The UN children's charity UNICEF Australia joined the fray, warning that it was no "silver bullet" and could push kids into "covert and unregulated" spaces online.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the ban may not be implemented perfectly -- much like existing alcohol restrictions -- but it was "the right thing to do".

He told reporters that the crackdown on sites like Facebook, Instagram, and X, approved by parliament late Thursday, will lead to "better outcomes and less harm for young Australians."

The prime minister said that platforms have a "social responsibility" to prioritize children's safety

"We've got your back, is our message to Australian parents."

Social media firms that fail to comply with the law face fines of up to Aus$50 million (US$32.5 million).

Meta, owner of Facebook and Instagram, and other companies said that despite the law's perceived shortcomings, they were keen to engage with the government to shape how it would be implemented in 12 months.

"We are concerned about the process, which rushed the legislation through while failing to properly consider the evidence, what industry already does to ensure age-appropriate experiences, and the voices of young people," Meta said.

The legislation offers almost no details on how the rules will be enforced -- prompting concern among experts that it will simply be an unenforceable, symbolic piece of legislation.

Meta called for consultation on the rules to ensure a "technically feasible outcome that does not place an onerous burden on parents and teens".

A Snapchat spokesperson said the company had raised "serious concerns" about the law and there remained "many unanswered questions" about how it would work.

However, the company said it would work closely with the government to develop an approach that balances "privacy, safety, and practicality."

"As always, Snap will comply with any applicable laws and regulations in Australia," it said.

UNICEF Australia policy chief Katie Maskiell cautioned that the ban was not a "silver bullet"

Maskiell said young people need to be protected online and included in the digital world.

"This ban risks pushing children into increasingly covert and unregulated online spaces as well as preventing them from accessing aspects of the online world essential to their wellbeing," she said.

One of the biggest issues will be privacy -- what age-verification information is used, how it is collected and by whom.

Social media companies remain adamant that app stores should handle age verification, but the government believes tech platforms should be responsible.

Exemptions will likely be granted to some companies, such as WhatsApp and YouTube, which teenagers may need to use for recreation, school work or other reasons.

Other countries will closely monitor the legislation, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans.

Lawmakers from Spain to Florida have proposed social media bans for young teens, although none of the measures have been implemented yet.

China has restricted access for minors since 2021, with under-14s not allowed to spend more than 40 minutes a day on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok.

Online gaming time for children is also limited in China.

TikTok 'disappointed' by Australian social media ban for under-16s

TikTok said Friday it was "disappointed" by Australian legislation banning under-16s from social media, warning that young people may end up going to unsafe areas of the web.

The government had ignored expert advice, a company spokesperson said, adding: "It's entirely likely the ban could see young people pushed to darker corners of the internet where no community guidelines, safety tools, or protections exist."

Based on AFP reports